Scoping review protocol on research prioritisation for preparedness and response to outbreaks of high consequence pathogens

Background: Prioritisation of research activities for infectious disease pathogens is usually undertaken through the identification important and knowledge gaps. Research prioritisation an essential element both effective responses to outbreaks adequate preparedness. There however currently no published mapping on evidence from high consequence pathogens. The objectives this review are map all exercises high-consequence pathogens; provide overview methodologies employed prioritising these describe monitoring evaluation processes areas prioritised; identify any standards guidance effectively undertaking pathogens. Methods: The Joanna Briggs Institute scoping conduct will be used. search using key terms “research prioritisation”, “response”, “control”, related terms, a list derived WHO (2020), EMERGE (2019), Europe CDC (2022) Association Southeast Asian Nations (2021). We WHO Global Index Medicus; Ovid Medline; Ovid Embase; Health; Scopus. Backward citations included full text documents also conducted. Google Scholar Overton searched grey literature. Two independent reviewers screen retrieved Rayyan and extract data in extraction template Microsoft Excel 2021. Screening results presented PRISMA-ScR with narrative synthesis extracted data. Conclusion: This existing priorities Further, it understanding used prioritisation, progress made against agendas, that could recommended pathogens.